Key Points
- Cornell’s report on the future of college says AI can make students look like they’re learning when they aren’t. It wants class technology used only when the instructor allows it.
- The report says admissions should reward students who are “well above the bar” instead of the most credentialed. It also calls for more openness about legacy and other special-case admits.
- Cornell’s sticker price hit $92,844, and the report calls the high-price, high-aid model “opaque by design.” It wants families to know what they’ll pay when they apply, not after they’re accepted.
Cornell University’s Committee on the Future of the American University released its final report (PDF File) last week to highlight their ideas on what the future of education should look like.
The 238-page document was written by 18 faculty members who spent a year meeting with more than 6,000 students, staff, alumni, trustees, officials, and outside critics across 250-plus meetings and events. It arrives as Americans’ confidence in higher education has fallen to 38%, down from 57% when Gallup first asked in 2015.
Provost Kavita Bala convened the group to study three forces: AI, the strained relationship with the federal government, and falling public trust. In the Cornell Chronicle announcement, Bala framed the central question directly: “Is a university education still worth it? The committee’s answer is a resounding yes – if we clarify and renew the university’s purpose.”
Families running their own college ROI math will notice the conditional in that sentence.
Would you like to save this?
We'll email this article to you, so you can come back to it later!
Why It Matters
Most of the recommendations are written for Cornell, but they apply to ever college. The report concedes that questions about “the cost of a college degree, the economic return for families carrying significant debt, and the role of wealthy institutions in a democratic society” are fair, and that universities “have too often deflected rather than engaged” them.
That admission lands at a time when college costs have risen three times faster than inflation by federal measures.
The Four Big Ideas
1. AI Threatens How Students Learn, Not Only How They Cheat
The committee places a big focus on AI because it “can produce the appearance of learning without the intellectual formation that makes learning meaningful and durable.” Its bluntest line: “A student who uses AI to produce an essay has not learned to write.” Bill Gates raised a similar concern about heavy AI use.
The fix is not a ban on using AI. The report wants the university to “lean in” and “lean out” of AI, build AI judgment into every major, and adopt a campus-wide rule that laptops, phones, and other tech are used in class only when the instructor explicitly invites them.
It floats optional tech-free dorms and a “tech detox” summer program before enrollment, and calls for faculty and student-life staff to act as “co-educators” rather than two separate operations. That matters as AI reshapes which majors students pick in the first place.
2. Admissions Should Reward “Enough,” Not “Most”
The committee blames the Common Application’s easy multi-school filing for a feedback loop: more applications drive lower admit rates, which push students to apply to even more schools. The result, it argues, turns high school into an exercise in personal branding.
Only 4% of four-year college students attend schools that admit fewer than 20% of applicants, yet those schools set the rules everyone chases.
Cornell’s proposed shift is a process that “rewards sufficiency (being well above the bar required to succeed) over being demonstrably ‘the best.'” The report also asks schools to publish evidence that their criteria predict student success, cap how many extracurriculars count, and explain how they handle legacy and other special-case admits.
It cites research finding legacy preferences explain almost half of the admissions edge top-1% families hold at Ivy-Plus schools, and mentions a medical-school-style matching system as a more radical option.
3. The High-Sticker, High-Aid Model Is Eroding Trust
Cornell’s total cost of attendance hit $92,844 for 2025-26, while median household income sits near $84,000. The average net cost after grants was $65,370, which illustrates what the report calls “opaque by design.”
Nationally, private nonprofit sticker prices reached $60,920, but the average amount paid was about $32,830, roughly flat after inflation for 20 years. We’ve covered that sticker-versus-net price gap repeatedly.
The committee recommends a task force to design a new tuition model and says, “Ideally, families will know their cost before or at the time of application, not at the time of acceptance.”
It rejects copying the free-tuition-under-an-income-cap offers spreading among elite schools, noting 83% of Cornell’s institutional grant aid comes from its operating budget, not the endowment. It also admits Cornell can’t currently answer whether it makes or loses money by enrolling more students.
4. Universities Have To Earn Back Public Support
The report calls the post-World War II research partnership with Washington “under severe strain” and warns that “A university that can only ask the questions its funders approve is no longer a university in any meaningful sense.” Schools like MIT are already shrinking graduate admissions as federal research funding drops.
Its answer is to earn back trust by showing up locally. The committee points to 2025 survey data showing 76% to 79% of respondents view universities’ community and healthcare impact positively, well above confidence in higher ed as an institution.
It proposes rewarding public-impact work in tenure decisions and creating professorships of public impact in every college. Graduates show a similar split: 90% report a good college experience, but only 70% say it was worth it.
What Cornell Says Shouldn’t Change
The committee explicitly rejected three popular ideas:
- Shifting to online-only degrees
- Imposing a single university-wide core curriculum
- Turning the undergraduate degree into vocational training.
On graduate education, it backs calibrating tuition by program and lowering prices where that expands enrollment, requiring a break-even budget case before launching new master’s programs, bringing back the M.Phil. as an exit credential for students who stop before finishing a Ph.D., and exploring a subscription model for lifelong learning.
Those ideas carry more weight now that new federal graduate loan limits are squeezing master’s programs.
How This Connects
Cornell follows a Yale committee report on trust from April 2026, and both land as more families question whether expensive colleges are worth it.
For reference, 31% of Cornell students graduated with debt in 2024, averaging about $30,000.
What’s Next
Provost Bala endorsed the report and said Cornell will “take action to address each of the report’s proposed commitments.” The report proposes a standing Future of the American University Forum to turn recommendations into pilots.
The tuition task force is the item to watch, because any change to Cornell’s net price would pressure its Ivy peers.
Editor: Colin Graves
Robert Farrington is the founder of The College Investor and is widely recognized as one of the nation’s leading voices on student loan debt and saving for college. He holds an MBA from UC San Diego Rady School of Management and has spent over 15 years researching, writing, and advising on student loans, 529 plans, financial aid programs, and saving and investing for young professionals.
Robert has been featured in the The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, NBC News, and Forbes, where he has been a regular personal finance contributor for over a decade. His work combines both professional expertise and personal experience – he successfully navigated his own student loan repayment journey and has helped thousands of readers do the same.
He is committed to making the intersection of personal finance and education transparent and accessible. You can learn more about Robert on the About Page or on his personal site RobertFarrington.com.