What Linda McMahon Means For U.S. Education Policy

Linda McMahon was officially sworn in as Secretary of Education on Monday, March 3, 2025, stepping into a role that is expected to undergo dramatic changes under President Trump’s administration. A longtime business executive, former head of the Small Business Administration, and major Republican donor, McMahon has made it clear that she intends to carry out the president’s vision of scaling back federal involvement in education.

In her first official communication, Secretary McMahon released a letter outlining her priorities, which include expanding school choice, reducing regulatory oversight, and ensuring that education policies reflect what she calls “the values of parents and local communities.”

“The Department of Education’s role in this new era of accountability is to restore the rightful role of state oversight in education and to end the overreach from Washington,” McMahon wrote.

Her appointment comes amid broader efforts by the Trump administration to reduce the size of the federal government. The president has long advocated for shrinking or eliminating the Department of Education, an idea that has gained renewed traction among conservatives in Congress.

While any move to shut down the department would require congressional approval, McMahon’s leadership is expected to significantly alter its scope and priorities.

Who Is Linda McMahon?

McMahon, 76, is best known for her tenure as CEO of World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE), where she helped build the company into a billion-dollar enterprise alongside her former husband, Vince McMahon. She later transitioned into politics, serving as head of the Small Business Administration from 2017 to 2019 under President Trump.

Her background in education includes a brief tenure on the Connecticut State Board of Education and a long history of supporting charter schools and school choice initiatives. McMahon has also been a major Republican fundraiser, leading America First Action, a pro-Trump super PAC, before returning to government service.

Her nomination sparked debate, with critics arguing that she lacks experience in public education, while supporters pointed to her business background and history of managing federal agencies. Despite concerns from Senate Democrats, McMahon was confirmed by a 51-45 vote.

During her confirmation hearing, McMahon emphasized that she would focus on reducing bureaucracy, increasing local control over education, and ensuring that taxpayer funds were being used effectively.

What McMahon’s Leadership Means For Education

While it's impossible to know what will happen over the next few years, McMahon’s letter outlines several broad priorities, many of which align with President Trump’s education agenda. Some of the most significant include:

1. Expanding School Choice

McMahon has vowed to support efforts to expand charter schools, private school vouchers, and education savings accounts, arguing that parents should have more control over where their children attend school.

“Parents are the primary decision-makers in their children’s education,” she wrote in her letter.

Trump has long championed school choice as a way to improve educational outcomes, particularly for low-income students. However, critics argue that expanding these programs could divert funding away from public schools to towards private schools.

2. Reducing Federal Oversight

One of McMahon’s most significant goals is returning more control over education policy to state and local governments. She argues that the Department of Education has become bloated with regulations that make it harder for schools to focus on core subjects like reading, math, science, and history.

Her office has already begun reviewing existing programs and regulations with the goal of eliminating what she calls “unnecessary bureaucracy.”

While supporters see this as a long-overdue reform, opponents warn that it could weaken protections for students, particularly in areas like special education and civil rights enforcement.

Related: What Eliminating The Department Of Education Could Look Like

3. Reviewing Federal Education Spending

McMahon has signaled that her department will conduct a full review of federal education spending, assessing which programs should be maintained and which should be cut. Her letter criticizes the Department of Education’s historical spending, arguing that student outcomes have not improved despite significant federal investment.

This push for cost-cutting aligns with broader White House efforts to reduce government spending and eliminate programs deemed inefficient. It remains to be seen how this will impact funding for initiatives like Pell Grants, student loan programs, and Title I funding for low-income schools.

What’s Next For The Department Of Education?

While McMahon has not explicitly stated that she will work toward dismantling the Department of Education, her letter strongly suggests a move toward significantly reducing its size and influence. The administration has already begun offering buyouts to department employees, a move widely seen as the first step toward downsizing.

In the coming months, McMahon is expected to work closely with Congress to reshape federal education policy. Some Republican lawmakers have introduced bills aimed at eliminating the department altogether, though such efforts are likely to face resistance in the Senate.

Many are also wondering how McMahon will navigate the ongoing crisis student loan borrowers are facing with various income driven repayment plans. This comes in the shadow of the College Cost Reduction Act proposal, which aims to significantly change higher education and student loan policy.

For now, McMahon’s tenure signals a shift toward deregulation, increased school choice, and a fundamental rethinking of the federal government’s role in education. Whether these changes will improve student outcomes or create further division remains to be seen.

Don't Miss These Other Stories: