Key Points
- The Justice Department has opened a review to determine whether financial aid programs at Harvard funded by China-based donors unlawfully exclude American students based on national origin.
- Harvard has disclosed nearly $4.5 billion in foreign funding (the most of any U.S. university) with more than $630 million coming from China-based sources, some of which restrict funds to financial aid "with preference given to students from particular countries."
- Harvard must turn over documents by July 31, 2026. If violations are found and not resolved voluntarily, penalties could include suspension or termination of federal funding, or a civil lawsuit.
The Justice Department announced Monday that it is investigating whether Harvard University's financial aid practices discriminate against American students, opening a compliance review under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 focused on scholarship programs funded by China-based donors.
At the center of the investigation is a question with implications far beyond just Harvard: can a university accept foreign donations that come with strings attached (specifically, requirements that the money fund financial aid favoring students from particular countries) while also receiving federal dollars that prohibit discrimination based on national origin?
"Every American student should have an equal opportunity to compete for college scholarships, grants, and other kinds of financial aid and benefits," said Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon, who leads the Civil Rights Division. "Schools cannot take federal dollars and then turn around and accept money from foreign sources to give financial aid that deliberately excludes American citizens — doing so is illegal, and we will stop it wherever we find it."
The department stressed it has not reached any conclusions. Harvard, in a statement to The Harvard Crimson, said it "does not unlawfully discriminate on the basis of race, ethnicity, or national origin in allocating financial aid" and that it is reviewing the letter and will engage with the government.
Would you like to save this?
We'll email this article to you, so you can come back to it later!
What Triggered The Investigation
The review grew out of an audit of Harvard's foreign funding disclosures. Under Section 117 of the Higher Education Act of 1965, colleges and universities must self-report foreign gifts and contracts valued at $250,000 or more. The Department of Education publishes those disclosures at foreignfundinghighered.gov, a new public portal the agency launched to make foreign funding data easier to inspect.
According to the Justice Department, those filings show Harvard is the American university receiving the most foreign funding, with nearly $4.5 billion disclosed. Its single largest source of foreign money is China, accounting for more than $630 million.
What caught investigators' attention was not the size of the funding but its terms. In a letter sent July 20 to Harvard's Vice President and General Counsel Jennifer O'Connor, the Civil Rights Division said Harvard's own disclosures show that multiple China-based gifts and contracts restrict how the university can use the money, including requirements that Harvard support or establish "financial aid funds with preference given to students from particular countries."
The department's theory is that by accepting those funds and honoring those restrictions, Harvard may be awarding financial aid based on national origin (presumably favoring Chinese students) to the potential detriment of students from other countries, including U.S. citizens.
Title VI prohibits any recipient of federal financial assistance from discriminating on the basis of race, color, or national origin.
What Harvard Must Do
The letter gives Harvard until July 31, 2026 to produce a wide range of records, with instructions to contact the department by July 24 if it needs to discuss an extension.
The document request covers what the department calls "Chinese Restricted Funds" or contributions with restricted uses received from entities affiliated with the People's Republic of China or other China-based sources.
Harvard must produce all documents and correspondence related to those funds, including emails, text messages, and chat communications, covering the gifts themselves, the restrictions donors placed on them, Harvard's policies for handling them, transfers of the money to students, and the nationalities preferred in any aid programs the funds support.
The department noted that some records may contain student information protected by the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), but said federal regulations authorize it to obtain that information without prior consent when enforcing federal law.
The stakes escalate if the review finds a violation. Under federal regulations, the department would first work with Harvard to secure compliance voluntarily. If that fails, it can move to suspend, terminate, or refuse to continue Harvard's federal financial aid programs or file a civil lawsuit.
The Larger Battle Between Harvard And The Trump Administration
This review is the latest in a series of federal actions targeting Harvard under the Trump administration. Harvard has faced a string of reviews tied to race in admissions, and at one point Trump even threatened to challenge Harvard's tax-exempt status.
Harvard the only school under the microscope. Federal civil rights enforcement has swept across higher education (at one point 60 universities faced warnings over discrimination complaints) and the Education Department has revived Section 117 enforcement with its own foreign funding investigation into the University of California, Berkeley, signaling that disclosure records are becoming a routine starting point for federal scrutiny of universities.
The department's message in this case is that those disclosures are not just paperwork but rather potential evidence that can trigger civil rights enforcement.
What This Means For Students
For most families, the immediate impact is limited. This is a compliance review, not a finding, and no financial aid programs have been suspended. But the case touches on issues that matter to anyone paying for college.
First, restricted scholarships are common across higher education. Donors regularly earmark aid for students from a particular state, high school, field of study, or background. This investigation tests where the legal line sits when those restrictions involve national origin at a school receiving federal funds. A finding against Harvard could push universities nationwide to restructure or decline donor-restricted aid tied to nationality, which could change what scholarships exist and who qualifies for them.
Second, families can now see for themselves where universities get foreign money. The foreignfundinghighered.gov portal lets anyone look up a school's disclosed foreign gifts and contracts which can be useful context for families weighing institutions, and a reminder that university aid budgets draw from many sources with many different conditions attached.
Third, if the dispute escalates to a funding fight, students could feel it. Federal financial assistance underpins budgets and, through federal student aid, flows to students directly. Harvard has so far kept its signature aid commitments including free tuition for families earning under $200,000, but a prolonged battle over federal funds adds financial pressure to any institution, even one with the nation's largest endowment, which already faces a higher federal endowment tax.
Don't Miss These Other Stories:
Editor: Colin Graves
Robert Farrington is the founder of The College Investor and is widely recognized as one of the nation’s leading voices on student loan debt and saving for college. He holds an MBA from UC San Diego Rady School of Management and has spent over 15 years researching, writing, and advising on student loans, 529 plans, financial aid programs, and saving and investing for young professionals.
Robert has been featured in the The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, NBC News, and Forbes, where he has been a regular personal finance contributor for over a decade. His work combines both professional expertise and personal experience – he successfully navigated his own student loan repayment journey and has helped thousands of readers do the same.
He is committed to making the intersection of personal finance and education transparent and accessible. You can learn more about Robert on the About Page or on his personal site RobertFarrington.com.